← Back to The Indiqa
हिन्दीContact
TheIndiqa.
CIVIL SERVICESCurrent affairs · Concepts · Revision
Search
Technology

A Delhi High Court PIL is targeting infinite scroll and autoplay, not just harmful content

The petition argues that engagement-maximising design itself should be examined as a regulatory issue, especially for young users.

Delhi High Court building - file photo
Business Standard - Delhi High Court file photo

A PIL filed in the Delhi High Court has challenged design features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, personalised feeds and persistent notifications on major social-media platforms. The petitioner argues that India’s current legal framework focuses mainly on content, while the architecture used to maximise engagement also deserves scrutiny.

The case could become significant if the court pushes regulators or expert bodies to distinguish between content moderation and product-design regulation. For UPSC, connect it to platform accountability, child and youth safety, mental-health concerns, intermediary regulation and the broader debate over how law should respond to algorithmic systems.

CIVIL SERVICES VIEW

Study this development

GS-IIGS-IIIGS-IVDigital regulation, platform accountability and youth safetyPrelims: MediumMains: High

Why this matters

The petition argues that engagement-maximising design itself should be examined as a regulatory issue, especially for young users.

Key terms

  • infinite scroll
  • autoplay
  • algorithmic feeds
  • platform regulation

Arguments, challenges and policy responses

  • Regulating design architecture separately from content
  • Balancing innovation, free expression and child safety

India’s context

India has one of the world’s largest populations of young social-media users, making design regulation a major public-policy issue.

Practice question

Should digital regulation address engagement-maximising design in addition to unlawful content? Discuss.

Revision summary

  • Regulating design architecture separately from content
  • Balancing innovation, free expression and child safety
Open bookmarks ↗
DISCUSSION & EDITORIAL REVIEW

Join the discussion

Comment on the story, report a factual or editorial issue, or tell us whether the article was useful.

Comments

Public comments appear after editorial review.

Loading comments…

Was this article useful?

Tell us in one tap. Details are optional.

Report a problem with this article

Reports are private and go directly to the editorial review queue.

READ NEXT

Continue reading

Related reporting on this topic and recent developments.